United States Sixth Circuit

In a First Amendment challenge to Defendant-Village's restriction on commercial speech, summary judgment for Plaintiff is affirmed where the Court of Appeals had reached the merits of Defendant-Village's motion for summary judgment in a prior opinion, and thus the District Court's entry of final judgment for Plaintiff was proper.

Appellate Information

• Decided 03/16/2009
• Published 03/16/2009

Judges

• Before MARTIN and GILMAN, Circuit Judges;  ZOUHARY, District Judge.

Court

• United States Sixth Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellees:
  
• ON BRIEF:  Lawrence E. Barbiere, Schroeder, Maundrell, Barbiere & Powers, Cincinnati, Ohio, for Appellant.  Jeff Rowes, William H. Mellor III, Institute for Justice, Arlington, Virginia, Melynda W. Cook-Reich, Repper, Pagan, Cook, Middletown, Ohio, for Appellee.