United States Sixth Circuit
US v. Boring, 07-4363
Defendant's conviction for worker's compensation fraud is affirmed where: 1) there was sufficient evidence that Defendant faked the severity of his injuries; and 2) Defendant's denial of guilt under oath subjected him to a sentence enhancement under U.S.S.G. section 3C1.1. Sentence is reversed, where the restitution award overstated the loss Defendant caused.
Appellate Information
- Decided 02/27/2009
- Published 02/27/2009
Judges
Court
- United States Sixth Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellees:
- ARGUED: Gregory J. Rufo, Rufo Law Firm, Canton, Ohio, for Appellant. Phillip J. Tripi, Assistant United States Attorney, Cleveland, Ohio, for Appellee. ON BRIEF: Gregory J. Rufo, Rufo Law Firm, Canton, Ohio, for Appellant. Phillip J. Tripi, Assistant United States Attorney, Cleveland, Ohio, for Appellee.