Skip to main content

United States Sixth Circuit


Adrian & Blissfield R.R. Co. v. Vill. of Blissfield, 07-1664

District court erred in finding that the Interstate Commerce Commission Termination Act preempts Mich. Comp. Laws section 462.309, which requires a Railroad to pay for the installation and upkeep of sidewalks and pedestrian crossings that abut and cross its property. The state law is not unreasonably burdensome, and because it addresses a general state concern about the safety of pedestrians it does not discriminate against railroads.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 12/18/2008
  • Published 12/18/2008

Judges

  • Before MOORE and CLAY, Circuit Judges;  SCHWARZER, District Judge.

Court

  • United States Sixth Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellees:
  • ARGUED:  Michael M. Wachsberg, Pedersen, Keenan, King, Wachsberg & Andrzejak, Commerce Township, Michigan, for Appellant.  Charles E. Kovsky, Charles E. Kovsky Assoc., Livonia, Michigan, for Appellee.   ON BRIEF:  Michael M. Wachsberg, Pedersen, Keenan, King, Wachsberg & Andrzejak, Commerce Township, Michigan, for Appellant.  Charles E. Kovsky, Charles E. Kovsky Assoc., Livonia, Michigan, David E. Sims, Finkel, Whitefield, Selik, Farmington Hills, Michigan, for Appellee.
Copied to clipboard