United States Sixth Circuit
Franklin v. Bradshaw, 07-3497
Dismissal of a petition for writ of habeas corpus challenging convictions for murder and felonious assault, with firearm specifications, is affirmed where the district court correctly found that a state court's rejection of a claim that petitioner's post-arrest silence was improperly used against him at trial was not an unreasonable application of Supreme Court precedent.
Appellate Information
- Decided 10/21/2008
- Published 10/21/2008
Judges
- Before: GUY, RYAN, and McKEAGUE, Circuit Judges.
Court
- United States Sixth Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellees:
- ARGUED: Stephen P. Hardwick, Ohio Public Defender's Office, Columbus, Ohio, for Appellant. Gene D. Park, Office of the Ohio Attorney General, Columbus, Ohio, for Appellee. ON BRIEF: Theresa G. Haire, Ohio Public Defender's Office, Columbus, Ohio, for Appellant. Gregory T. Hartke, Office of the Ohio Attorney General, Cleveland, Ohio, for Appellee.