Skip to main content

United States Sixth Circuit


US v. Alexander, 07-1758

A sentence for possessing crack cocaine with the intent to distribute is affirmed where: 1) the district court did not commit a plain error in designating defendant a career offender for sentencing purposes as he committed a prior crime of violence, and he otherwise satisfied the criteria necessary to be considered a career offender; and 2) the sentence was otherwise reasonable.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 10/07/2008
  • Published 10/07/2008

Judges

  • Before:  DAUGHTREY, GILMAN, and ALARCÓN, Circuit Judges.

Court

  • United States Sixth Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellees:
  • ARGUED:  Paul L. Nelson, Federal Public Defender's Office, Grand Rapids, Michigan, for Appellant.  Timothy P. VerHey, Assistant United States Attorney, Grand Rapids, Michigan, for Appellee.   ON BRIEF:  Paul L. Nelson, Federal Public Defender's Office, Grand Rapids, Michigan, for Appellant.  B. Rene Shekmer, Assistant United States Attorney, Grand Rapids, Michigan, for Appellee.
Copied to clipboard