United States Sixth Circuit
US v. Hardin, 06-6277
Denial of defendant's motion to suppress evidence is reversed and his conviction for drug- and firearm-related offenses is vacated where: 1) the circuit court leaves unanswered whether probable cause or "reason to believe" is the correct standard governing when officers may enter a residence to execute an arrest warrant; but 2) an apartment manager in this case was acting as an agent of the government, and officers' remaining information failed to establish even a reasonable belief that defendant was inside an apartment; and 3) thus, a search of the apartment violated defendant's Fourth Amendment rights, and all evidence obtained as a result should have been suppressed.
Appellate Information
- Decided 08/25/2008
- Published 08/25/2008
Judges
- Before: BATCHELDER, MOORE, and COLE, Circuit Judges.
Court
- United States Sixth Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellees:
- ARGUED: John E. Eldridge, Eldridge & Gaines, Knoxville, Tennessee, for Appellant. David Charles Jennings, Assistant United States Attorney, Knoxville, Tennessee, for Appellee. ON BRIEF: John E. Eldridge, Eldridge & Gaines, Knoxville, Tennessee, for Appellant. David Charles Jennings, Assistant United States Attorney, Knoxville, Tennessee, for Appellee. Malik D. Hardin, Ray Brook, New York, pro se.