Skip to main content
Find a Lawyer

United States Sixth Circuit


U.S. v. Martin, 06-5002

A conviction and sentence for being a felon in possession of a firearm is affirmed where: 1) defendant waived his right to challenge the sufficiency of the evidence by entering a guilty plea without reserving the right to appeal the issue; 2) he waived his right to appeal a denial of a motion to disclose a confidential informant's identity; 3) there was no error in denying defendant's motion to suppress evidence since there was sufficient probable cause for a search warrant; 4) there was no error in determining that the defendant's prior convictions subjected him to sentencing as an armed career criminal; and 5) the court did not violate the constitution in finding that defendant's prior convictions qualified as serious drug offenses so as to enhance his sentence as a career criminal.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 05/23/2008
  • Published 05/23/2008

Judges

  • Before:  BATCHELDER and DAUGHTREY, Circuit Judges;  ROSEN, District Judge.

Court

  • United States Sixth Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellees:
  • ARGUED:  Peter B. Coughlan, Fort Thomas, Kentucky, for Appellant.   Laura K. Voorhees, Assistant United States Attorney, Fort Mitchell, Kentucky, for Appellee.   ON BRIEF:  Peter B. Coughlan, Fort Thomas, Kentucky, for Appellant.  Laura K. Voorhees, Assistant United States Attorney, Fort Mitchell, Kentucky, Charles P. Wisdom, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Lexington, Kentucky, for Appellee.
Copied to clipboard