United States Sixth Circuit
Harris v. Haberlin, 05-5591
Dismissal of a habeas petition raising Batson challenges to the prosecution's exercise of its peremptory strikes as race-based is vacated and the case remanded where the trial court was in a better position, not the appellate court, to consider newly discovered video evidence providing direct information about the prosecution's state of mind as part of the Batson fact-finding process.
Appellate Information
- Decided 05/22/2008
- Published 05/22/2008
Judges
- Before: BATCHELDER, COLE, and GRIFFIN, Circuit Judges.
Court
- United States Sixth Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellees:
- ARGUED: David J. Debold, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, Washington, D.C., for Appellant. Samuel J. Floyd, Jr., Office Of The Attorney General, Frankfort, Kentucky, for Appellee. ON BRIEF: David J. Debold, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, Washington, D.C., for Appellant. Samuel J. Floyd, Jr., Office of the Attorney General, Frankfort, Kentucky, for Appellee.