Skip to main content

United States Sixth Circuit


Harris v. Haberlin, 05-5591

Dismissal of a habeas petition raising Batson challenges to the prosecution's exercise of its peremptory strikes as race-based is vacated and the case remanded where the trial court was in a better position, not the appellate court, to consider newly discovered video evidence providing direct information about the prosecution's state of mind as part of the Batson fact-finding process.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 05/22/2008
  • Published 05/22/2008

Judges

  • Before:  BATCHELDER, COLE, and GRIFFIN, Circuit Judges.

Court

  • United States Sixth Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellees:
  • ARGUED:  David J. Debold, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, Washington, D.C., for Appellant.  Samuel J. Floyd, Jr., Office Of The Attorney General, Frankfort, Kentucky, for Appellee.   ON BRIEF:  David J. Debold, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, Washington, D.C., for Appellant.  Samuel J. Floyd, Jr., Office of the Attorney General, Frankfort, Kentucky, for Appellee.
Copied to clipboard