Skip to main content
Find a Lawyer

United States Sixth Circuit


US v. Martin, 06-5605

A conviction and sentence for drug- and firearm-related offenses is affirmed primarily where the district court's permitting a police officer to testify as both an expert and a fact witness, without the issuance of a cautionary instruction to the jury, did not constitute reversible error under US v. Lopez-Medina, 461 F.3d 724 (6th Cir. 2006).

Appellate Information

  • Decided 03/31/2008
  • Published 03/31/2008

Judges

  • Before: NORRIS, BATCHELDER, and GIBBONS, Circuit Judges.

Court

  • United States Sixth Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellees:
  • ARGUED:  Roger W. Kirk, Cincinnati, Ohio, for Appellant.  Terry M. Cushing, Assistant United States Attorney, Louisville, Kentucky, for Appellee.   ON BRIEF:  Roger W. Kirk, Cincinnati, Ohio, for Appellant.   Terry M. Cushing, Monica Wheatley, Assistant United States Attorneys, Louisville, Kentucky, for Appellee.
Copied to clipboard