United States Sixth Circuit

NLRB's petition to enforce its order holding that union and an apprenticeship committee retaliated against an apprentice for being delinquent in paying his union dues and for expressing anti-union views is remanded remand to the NLRB for further consideration and articulation of its conclusion that the apprenticeship committee acted as an agent of the union.

Appellate Information

• Decided 01/31/2008
• Published 01/31/2008

Judges

• Before:  MERRITT, COLE, and GRIFFIN, Circuit Judges.

Court

• United States Sixth Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellees:
  
• ARGUED:  Daniel A. Blitz, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for Petitioner.  R. Jan Jennings, Branstetter, Stranch & Jennings, Nashville, Tennessee, Sue D. Gunter, Sherman, Dunn, Cohen, Leifer & Yellig, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.  Gary L. Lieber, Saul Ewing, Washington, D.C., for Amicus Curiae.  Sally M. Tedrow, O'Donoghue & O'Donoghue, Washington, D.C., for Amicus Curiae. ON BRIEF:  Daniel A. Blitz, Linda Dreeben, Julie B. Broido, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for Petitioner.  R. Jan Jennings, Branstetter, Stranch & Jennings, Nashville, Tennessee, Sue D. Gunter, Martin J. Crane, Sherman, Dunn, Cohen, Leifer & Yellig, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.  Sally M. Tedrow, O'Donoghue & O'Donoghue, Washington, D.C., Gary L. Lieber, Saul Ewing, Washington, D.C., for Amici Curiae.