Skip to main content

United States Sixth Circuit


US v. Madden, 05-4304, 06-3736

Defendants' convictions and sentences for, inter alia, drug-related offenses are affirmed over claims that: 1) the court did not have jurisdiction to sanction one defendant for his prior supervised-release violation; and 2) other defendant's sentence was error as the district court failed to adequately consider her request for a reduced sentence.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 01/25/2008
  • Published 01/25/2008

Judges

  • Before SILER, MOORE, and GILMAN, Circuit Judges.

Court

  • United States Sixth Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellees:
  • ON BRIEF:  Nathan A. Ray, Akron, Ohio, Terry H. Gilbert, Friedman & Gilbert, Cleveland, Ohio, for Appellants.  Robert J. Patton, Assistant United States Attorney, Cleveland, Ohio, for Appellee.
Copied to clipboard