In an action against a school district and a school superintendent raising First Amendment retaliation and privacy claims, summary judgment for defendants is affirmed in part, but reversed as to one plaintiff's retaliation claim against the superintendent where: 1) the district court incorrectly held that plaintiffs' speech was not constitutionally protected because it did not touch upon a matter of public concern; 2) the superintendent's alleged actions, dismissing plaintiff's child from school, being involved in making a false report to Children Services, and refusing to provide home-school education through the services of a tutor, would chill a person of ordinary firmness from engaging in speech; and 3) defendant allegedly admitted that plaintiff's complaints prompted him to be involved in reporting her to Children Services.