United States Sixth Circuit

Dismissal of a petition for a writ of habeas corpus is affirmed where it was not objectively unreasonable for a state court of appeals to find that the use of videoconferencing at petitioner's parole revocation hearing did not violate his rights to due process and to confront his accuser, and therefore did not violate the Fifth and Sixth Amendments.

Appellate Information

• Decided 01/14/2008
• Published 01/14/2008

Judges

• Before: BOGGS, Chief Judge;  GIBBONS, Circuit Judge;  BELL, Chief District Judge.

Court

• United States Sixth Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellees:
  
• ARGUED:  Theresa G. Haire, Public Defender's Office, Columbus, Ohio, for Appellant.  M. Scott Criss, Office of the Ohio Attorney General, Columbus, Ohio, for Appellee.   ON BRIEF:  Theresa G. Haire, Public Defender's Office, Columbus, Ohio, for Appellant.  M. Scott Criss, Office Of The Ohio Attorney General, Columbus, Ohio, for Appellee.