United States Sixth Circuit
Chase Manhattan Mortgage Corp. v. Smith, 06-4656
In an appeal arising after defendants removed a state court foreclosure action to federal district court and plaintiff's motion to remand was granted, an award to plaintiff of the attorney's fees and costs incurred as a result of the removal is affirmed where defendants' removal action lacked an objectively reasonable basis.
Appellate Information
- Argued 10/25/2007
- Decided 11/26/2007
- Published 11/26/2007
Judges
- ROGERS, Circuit Judge., Before: MERRITT, ROGERS, and McKEAGUE, Circuit Judges.
Court
- United States Sixth Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellees:
- ARGUED: Rose Ann Fleming, Rose Ann Fleming, Professional Corporation, Cincinnati, Ohio, for Appellants. Vladimir P. Belo, Bricker & Eckler, Columbus, Ohio, for Appellee. ON BRIEF: Rose Ann Fleming, Rose Ann Fleming, Professional Corporation, Cincinnati, Ohio, for Appellants. Vladimir P. Belo, Nelson Marlin Reid, Bricker & Eckler, Columbus, Ohio, for Appellee.