United States Sixth Circuit
US v. Conrad, 05-5319
A conviction for conspiracy to possess and possession with intent to distribute methamphetamine is remanded for further proceedings where the district court committed reversible error when it admitted an individual's out-of-court statement under the co-conspirator's exception to the hearsay rule using the wrong legal standard and without finding that the elements of that exception had been proven by a preponderance of the evidence.
Appellate Information
- Decided 11/09/2007
- Published 11/09/2007
Judges
- Before: MARTIN and ROGERS, Circuit Judges; HOOD, District Judge.
Court
- United States Sixth Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellees:
- ARGUED: David W. Camp, Law Office of David Camp, Jackson, Tennessee, for Appellant. Richard Leigh Grinalds, Assistant United States Attorney, Jackson, Tennessee, for Appellee. ON BRIEF: David W. Camp, Law Office of David Camp, Jackson, Tennessee, for Appellant. Richard Leigh Grinalds, Assistant United States Attorney, Jackson, Tennessee, for Appellee.