United States Sixth Circuit

A conviction and sentence on charges of interstate transportation of child pornography and possession of child pornography is affirmed where: 1) the district court properly denied defendant's request for a two-level reduction in his base offense level under U.S.S.G. section 2G2.2(b)(1) (2005) because defendant's conduct was not "limited" to the receipt or solicitation of materials involving the sexual exploitation of a minor; and 2) challenges to the conviction were meritless.

Appellate Information

• Decided 11/08/2007
• Published 11/08/2007

Judges

• Before: MOORE and GRIFFIN, Circuit Judges;  GRAHAM, District Judge.

Court

• United States Sixth Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellees:
  
• ON BRIEF:  Gary W. Lanker, Law Office of Gary W. Lanker, Memphis, Tennessee, for Appellant.  Charles P. Wisdom, Jr., Erin J. May, Assistant United States Attorneys, Lexington, Kentucky, for Appellee.   James T. Fore II, Terre Haute, Indiana, pro se.