Skip to main content

United States Sixth Circuit


US v. Smith, 06-5681

A 132-month sentence for bank robbery is affirmed where defendant's above-the-Guidelines sentence was both procedurally and substantively reasonable, and thus the district court did not abuse its sentencing discretion.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 10/11/2007
  • Published 10/11/2007

Judges

  • Before:  COLE and GRIFFIN, Circuit Judges;  WATSON, District Judge.

Court

  • United States Sixth Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellees:
  • ARGUED:  Robert D. Philyaw, Law Office Of Robert D. Philyaw, Signal Mountain, Tennessee, for Appellant.  Christopher D. Poole, Assistant United States Attorney, Chattanooga, Tennessee, for Appellee.   ON BRIEF:  Robert D. Philyaw, Law Office of Robert D. Philyaw, Signal Mountain, Tennessee, for Appellant.  Christopher D. Poole, Assistant United States Attorney, Chattanooga, Tennessee, for Appellee.
Copied to clipboard