United States Sixth Circuit

In an action claiming that a township's sign regulations violated the First and Fourteenth Amendment, summary judgment for the township is affirmed as, because certain valid size and height requirements were severable from the allegedly unconstitutional provisions at issue, and because they prohibited plaintiffs from obtaining relief on their damages and injunction claims, the district court properly relied on those provisions in concluding that plaintiffs lacked standing to bring the lawsuit.

Appellate Information

• Decided 10/01/2007
• Published 10/01/2007

Judges

• Before:  CLAY and SUTTON, Circuit Judges;  GREER, District Judge.

Court

• United States Sixth Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellees:
  
• ARGUED:  E. Adam Webb, The Webb Law Group, Atlanta, Georgia, for Appellants.  Kevin Lantz, Surdyk Dowd & Turner, Dayton, Ohio, for Appellee.   ON BRIEF:  E. Adam Webb, The Webb Law Group, Atlanta, Georgia, for Appellants.  Kevin Lantz, Robert J. Surdyk, Surdyk Dowd & Turner, Dayton, Ohio, for Appellee.