United States Sixth Circuit

In a suit lawsuit alleging, inter alia, that defendants engaged in a fraudulent transfer of assets to avoid a debt owed to plaintiff, order granting defendants' motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction is reversed as the district court's exercise of jurisdiction over defendants was both authorized by Michigan law and, contrary to the finding below, consistent with constitutional due process.

Appellate Information

• Decided 09/27/2007
• Published 09/27/2007

Judges

• Before:  ROGERS and COOK, Circuit Judges;  O'MALLEY, District Judge.

Court

• United States Sixth Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellees:
  
• ARGUED:  David P. Fornshell, Dinsmore & Shohl, Cincinnati, Ohio, for Appellant.  Mark D. Murphy, Murphy Law Firm, Overland Park, Kansas, for Appellees.   ON BRIEF:  David P. Fornshell, Dinsmore & Shohl, Cincinnati, Ohio, for Appellant.  Mark D. Murphy, Murphy Law Firm, Overland Park, Kansas, for Appellees.