United States Sixth Circuit

A sentence for various drug and firearms offenses is affirmed as: 1) a previous remand of the case was a limited remand, not a general remand, and the district court properly followed the circuit court's directives; 2) although review of Booker claims was not foreclosed by the limited remand, the sentence was neither procedurally nor substantively unreasonable and the 18 U.S.C. section 3553(a) factors were properly applied; and 3) there was no abuse of discretion in a denial of his motions for sentencing discovery.

Appellate Information

• Decided 09/26/2007
• Published 09/26/2007

Judges

• Before SILER and COOK, Circuit Judges;  REEVES, District Judge.

Court

• United States Sixth Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellees:
  
• ARGUED:  Herbert S. Moncier, Law Offices of Herbert S. Moncier, Knoxville, Tennessee, for Appellant.  David C. Jennings, Assistant United States Attorney, Knoxville, Tennessee, for Appellee. ON BRIEF:  Herbert S. Moncier, Law Offices of Herbert S. Moncier, Knoxville, Tennessee, for Appellant.  David C. Jennings, Assistant United States Attorney, Knoxville, Tennessee, for Appellee.