United States Sixth Circuit

In civil rights action over a "property check" conducted by a conservation officer, summary judgment for defendant is affirmed over claims that the trial court erred in finding that: 1) the conservation officer's conduct did not constitute a search or an invasion of privacy; 2) the conservation officer was entitled to qualified immunity; and 3) plaintiff lacked standing to seek prospective injunctive relief against the director in her official capacity.

Appellate Information

• Decided 09/14/2007
• Published 09/14/2007

Judges

• Before: KENNEDY and GIBBONS, Circuit Judges;  ALDRICH, District Judge.

Court

• United States Sixth Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellees:
  
• ARGUED:  Steven J. Vander Ark, Grand Rapids, Michigan, for Appellant.  Mark E. Donnelly, Office of the Attorney General, Lansing, Michigan, for Appellees.   ON BRIEF:  Steven J. Vander Ark, Grand Rapids, Michigan, for Appellant.  Mark E. Donnelly, Office of the Attorney General, Lansing, Michigan, for Appellees.