United States Sixth Circuit

A sentence for bank robbery charges imposed following a remand for resentencing is vacated and remanded pursuant to the government's claims of error that: 1) the district court improperly considered the impact of a mandatory, consecutive sentence when determining the reasonableness of the sentences under Booker; and 2) the district court imposed substantively unreasonable sentences based upon its misinterpretation of the circuit court's prior opinion in the case.

Appellate Information

• Decided 08/28/2007
• Published 08/28/2007

Judges

• Before:  MOORE and GILMAN, Circuit Judges;  FORESTER, District Judge.

Court

• United States Sixth Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellees:
  
• ARGUED:  Sarah Resnick Cohen, United States Attorney, Detroit, Michigan, for Plaintiff.  Douglas R. Mullkoff, Ann Arbor, Michigan, Robert M. Jensen, Laufman, Jensen & Napolitano, Cincinnati, Ohio, for Defendants.   ON BRIEF:  Sarah Resnick Cohen, United States Attorney, Detroit, Michigan, for Plaintiff.  Douglas R. Mullkoff, Ann Arbor, Michigan, Robert M. Jensen, Laufman, Jensen & Napolitano, Cincinnati, Ohio, for Defendants.