United States Sixth Circuit
Weisbarth v. Geauga Park Dist., 06-4189
In a First Amendment retaliation action brought by a terminated park ranger alleging that defendant fired her due to comments she made to a consultant it hired to interview employees as part of a departmental evaluation, dismissal of the complaint for failure to state a claim is affirmed where plaintiff's speech was not protected by the First Amendment as she did not speak "as a citizen", but instead spoke pursuant to her employment responsibilities.
Appellate Information
- Decided 08/24/2007
- Published 08/24/2007
Judges
- Before: COLE and GILMAN, Circuit Judges; MARBLEY, District Judge.
Court
- United States Sixth Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellees:
- ARGUED: Joseph M. Hegedus, Ohio Patrolmen's Benevolent Assn., Columbus, Ohio, for Appellant. David S. Kessler, Blaugrund, Herbert & Martin, Dublin, Ohio, for Appellees. ON BRIEF: Joseph M. Hegedus, Ohio Patrolmen's Benevolent Assn., Columbus, Ohio, Kevin P. Powers, Ohio Patrolmen's Benevolent Assn., North Royalton, Ohio, for Appellant. David S. Kessler, Blaugrund, Herbert & Martin, Dublin, Ohio, Stephen P. Postalakis, Blaugrund, Herbert & Martin, Worthington, Ohio, for Appellees.