United States Sixth Circuit

It does not constitute reversible error to consider 18 U.S.C. section 3553(a)(2)(A) when imposing a sentence for violation of supervised release, even though this factor is not enumerated in 18 U.S.C. section 3583(e). Revocation of defendant's supervised release and a resulting sentence are affirmed over a claim that the district court incorrectly interpreted the conditions of supervised release and relied on improper considerations in determining his sentence.

Appellate Information

• Argued 07/18/2007
• Decided 08/13/2007
• Published 08/13/2007

Judges

• Before: MARTIN and McKEAGUE, Circuit Judges;  GREER, District Judge.

Court

• United States Sixth Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellees:
  
• ARGUED:Anne-Marie Moyes, Federal Public Defender's Office, Nashville, Tennessee, for Appellant.  William L. Deneke, Assistant United States Attorney, Nashville, Tennessee, for Appellee.   ON BRIEF:Ronald C. Small, Michael C. Holley, Federal Public Defender's Office, Nashville, Tennessee, for Appellant.  William L. Deneke, Assistant United States Attorney, Nashville, Tennessee, for Appellee.