United States Sixth Circuit

In a suit over an allegedly defective recreational vehicle, summary judgment for defendant-manufacturer is affirmed where: 1) the admission of a report by defendant's employee was harmless error; and 2) the district court thoroughly and accurately set forth the undisputed facts and the governing law.

Appellate Information

• Decided 07/31/2007
• Published 07/31/2007

Judges

• Before:  MARTIN and DAUGHTREY, Circuit Judges;  SCHWARZER, District Judge.

Court

• United States Sixth Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellees:
  
• ARGUED:  Karl P. Heil, Consumer Legal Services P.C., Garden City, Michigan, for Appellant.  Michael D. Dolenga, Dolenga & Dolenga, PLLC, Farmington, Michigan, for Appellee.   ON BRIEF:  Karl P. Heil, Mark P. Romano, Consumer Legal Services P.C., Garden City, Michigan, for Appellant.   Michael D. Dolenga, Jeffrey R. Nowicki, Dolenga & Dolenga, PLLC, Farmington, Michigan, for Appellee.