Skip to main content

United States Sixth Circuit


US v. Lanesky, 05-2228

A sentence for conspiracy to commit bank fraud and launder the proceeds, and bank fraud is vacated and remanded where the district court: 1) neither ruled on objections defendant raised with regard to a presentence report (PSR) nor determined that the matters would not affect or be considered in the sentencing; and 2) did not calculate and consider a correct advisory guideline sentence.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 07/11/2007
  • Published 07/11/2007

Judges

  • Before:  BATCHELDER, GILMAN, and ROGERS, Circuit Judges.

Court

  • United States Sixth Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellees:
  • ARGUED:  Mark J. Kriger, LaRene & Kriger, Detroit, Michigan, for Appellant.  Cynthia J. Oberg, Assistant United States Attorney, Detroit, Michigan, for Appellee.   ON BRIEF:  Mark J. Kriger, N.C. Deday LaRene, LaRene & Kriger, Detroit, Michigan, for Appellant.  Cynthia J. Oberg, Assistant United States Attorney, Detroit, Michigan, for Appellee.
Copied to clipboard