United States Sixth Circuit
Ramonez v. Berghuis, 06-1852
Denial of a petition for a writ of habeas corpus challenging a conviction for home invasion, assault with intent to do great bodily harm, and aggravated stalking is reversed where a state court's application of the Strickland standard for a defense counsel's duty to investigate was unreasonable in regard to his failure to investigate and call three witnesses to the alleged crime.
Appellate Information
- Decided 06/18/2007
- Published 06/18/2007
Judges
- Before: DAUGHTREY and MOORE, Circuit Judges; SHADUR, District Judge.
Court
- United States Sixth Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellees:
- ARGUED: Jacqueline J. McCann, State Appellate Defender Office, Detroit, Michigan, for Appellant. Raina I. Korbakis, Office of the Attorney General, Lansing, Michigan, for Appellee. ON BRIEF: Jacqueline J. McCann, State Appellate Defender Office, Detroit, Michigan, for Appellant. Raina I. Korbakis, Office of the Attorney General, Lansing, Michigan, for Appellee.