Skip to main content

United States Sixth Circuit


Durr v. Mitchell, 00-3353

Denial of a death row inmate's petition for a writ of habeas corpus is affirmed over challenges to the district court's: 1) procedural default rulings; 2) denial of a Sixth Amendment claim that the trial court failed to appoint an independent psychologist; 3) denial of an ineffective assistance of counsel claim; and 4) denial of a sufficiency of evidence claim.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 05/18/2007
  • Published 05/18/2007

Judges

  • Before:  SUHRHEINRICH, BATCHELDER, and COLE, Circuit Judges.

Court

  • United States Sixth Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellees:
  • ARGUED:  Kathleen A. McGarry, McGarry Law Office, Glorieta, New Mexico, for Appellant.  Stephen E. Maher, Attorney General's Office of Ohio, Columbus, Ohio, for Appellee.   ON BRIEF:  Kathleen A. McGarry, McGarry Law Office, Glorieta, New Mexico, Dennis Lyle Sipe, Buell & Sipe Co. L.P.A., Marietta, Ohio, for Appellant.  Stephen E. Maher, Attorney General's Office of Ohio, Columbus, Ohio, for Appellee.
Copied to clipboard