United States Sixth Circuit
Durr v. Mitchell, 00-3353
Denial of a death row inmate's petition for a writ of habeas corpus is affirmed over challenges to the district court's: 1) procedural default rulings; 2) denial of a Sixth Amendment claim that the trial court failed to appoint an independent psychologist; 3) denial of an ineffective assistance of counsel claim; and 4) denial of a sufficiency of evidence claim.
Appellate Information
- Decided 05/18/2007
- Published 05/18/2007
Judges
- Before: SUHRHEINRICH, BATCHELDER, and COLE, Circuit Judges.
Court
- United States Sixth Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellees:
- ARGUED: Kathleen A. McGarry, McGarry Law Office, Glorieta, New Mexico, for Appellant. Stephen E. Maher, Attorney General's Office of Ohio, Columbus, Ohio, for Appellee. ON BRIEF: Kathleen A. McGarry, McGarry Law Office, Glorieta, New Mexico, Dennis Lyle Sipe, Buell & Sipe Co. L.P.A., Marietta, Ohio, for Appellant. Stephen E. Maher, Attorney General's Office of Ohio, Columbus, Ohio, for Appellee.