United States Sixth Circuit

In an ERISA suit brought against a company seeking to recover benefits allegedly owed to plaintiff as a beneficiary of her father's life insurance policy with the company and alleging violations of ERISA disclosure requirements, summary judgment for defendant-company is affirmed where plaintiff received all of the life insurance benefits she was due and the company's conduct did not warrant monetary penalties.

Appellate Information

• Decided 03/16/2007
• Published 03/16/2007

Judges

• Before GILMAN and SUTTON, Circuit Judges;  TARNOW, District Judge.

Court

• United States Sixth Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellees:
  
• ARGUED:  Stephen C. Emery, Stewart, Roelandt, Stoess, Craigmyle & Emery, Crestwood, Kentucky, for Appellant.  Raymond A. Kresge, Cozen O'Connor, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, for Appellee.   ON BRIEF:  Stephen C. Emery, John Frith Stewart, Stewart, Roelandt, Stoess, Craigmyle & Emery, Crestwood, Kentucky, for Appellant.  Raymond A. Kresge, Cozen O'Connor, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, for Appellee.