United States Sixth Circuit

A maximum sentence for possession of child pornography and criminal forfeiture is affirmed over a reasonableness challenge as defendant received sufficient consideration of the appropriate sentencing factors, and the district court's alleged use of the word "reasonable" during sentencing would not be error even if it did occur.

Appellate Information

• Decided 03/09/2007
• Published 03/09/2007

Judges

• Before: KEITH and McKEAGUE, Circuit Judges;  CLELAND, District Judge.

Court

• United States Sixth Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellees:
  
• ARGUED:  Stephen B. Shankman, Office of the Federal Public Defender, Memphis, Tennessee, for Appellant.  Dan L. Newsom, Assistant United States Attorney, Memphis, Tennessee, for Appellee.   ON BRIEF:  Stephen B. Shankman, J. Patten Brown, III, Office of the Federal Public Defender, Memphis, Tennessee, for Appellant.  Dan L. Newsom, Assistant United States Attorney, Memphis, Tennessee, for Appellee.