United States Sixth Circuit

For purposes of the standing requirements for suit in federal court, a plaintiff is required to establish injury in fact as to each provision of a statute challenged, even under the overbreadth doctrine. Dismissal of a lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of a sign ordinance of a city in Tennessee is affirmed where plaintiff lacked standing for the claims at issue.

Appellate Information

• Decided 01/22/2007
• Published 01/22/2007

Judges

• Before MARTIN, NORRIS, and McKEAGUE, Circuit Judges.

Court

• United States Sixth Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellees:
  
• ARGUED:  E. Adam Webb, Webb & Porter, Atlanta, Georgia, for Appellant.  Mary B. Ferrara, Farrar & Bates, Nashville, Tennessee, for Appellee.   ON BRIEF:  E. Adam Webb, Webb & Porter, Atlanta, Georgia, for Appellant.  Mary B. Ferrara, Kristin Ellis Berexa, Farrar & Bates, Nashville, Tennessee, for Appellee.  William D. Brinton, Ruth A. Holmes, Cristine M. Russell, Rogers Towers, Jacksonville, Florida, Randal R. Morrison, Sabine & Morrison, San Diego, California, Robin M. Wolpert, John M. Baker, Greene Espel, Minneapolis, Minnesota, for Amici Curiae.