United States Sixth Circuit

A sentence on counts related to a conspiracy to distribute methamphetamine mixture is affirmed over defendant's reasonableness challenge where he failed to demonstrate either that: 1) the district court's consideration of the relevant sentencing factors was deficient; or 2) the sentence imposed by the district court was substantively unreasonable.

Appellate Information

• Decided 12/12/2006
• Published 12/12/2006

Judges

• Before: MARTIN, NORRIS, and GIBBONS, Circuit Judges.

Court

• United States Sixth Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellees:
  
• ON BRIEF:  Bryan H. Hoss, Davis & Hoss, Chattanooga, Tennessee, for Appellant.  Perry H. Piper, Assistant United States Attorney, Chattanooga, Tennessee, for Appellee.