United States Sixth Circuit
Lyell v. Renico, 04-1106
Denial of a petition for a writ of habeas corpus from a conviction for assault with intent to commit murder, which claimed that a trial court coerced the jury into reaching a guilty verdict by improperly polling the jury and exhibited bias and partiality that denied petitioner a fair trial, is reversed in part where the trial judge's conduct violated petitioner's due-process right to a fair trial.
Appellate Information
- Decided 12/01/2006
- Published 12/01/2006
Judges
- Before: CLAY and SUTTON, Circuit Judges; OBERDORFER, District Judge.
Court
- United States Sixth Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellees:
- ARGUED: Michael J. Newman, Dinsmore & Shohl, Cincinnati, Ohio, for Appellant. William C. Campbell, Office of the Attorney General, Lansing, Michigan, for Appellee. ON BRIEF: Michael J. Newman, Jennifer K. Swartz, Daniel J. Greenberg, Dinsmore & Shohl, Cincinnati, Ohio, for Appellant. William C. Campbell, Office of the Attorney General, Lansing, Michigan, for Appellee. Earl Ray Lyell, Muskegon Heights, Michigan, pro se.