United States Sixth Circuit

An order of the NLRB finding that an employer violated the National Labor Relations Act is affirmed and enforced where there was substantial evidence to support the Board's findings that the employer violated the Act by: 1) withdrawing union recognition; 2) insisting that a union produce a bargaining agenda; and 3) enforcing a cellular telephone reimbursement policy.

Appellate Information

• Decided 11/21/2006
• Published 11/21/2006

Judges

• Before BATCHELDER and MOORE, Circuit Judges;  HOOD, Chief District Judge.

Court

• United States Sixth Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellees:
  
• ARGUED:  Timothy J. Ryan, Ryan & Lykins, Grand Rapids, Michigan, for Petitioner.  Stacy G. Zimmerman, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.  Jason J. Valtos, Osborne Law Offices, Washington, D.C., for Intervenor.   ON BRIEF:  Timothy J. Ryan, Ryan & Lykins, Grand Rapids, Michigan, for Petitioner.  Stacy G. Zimmerman, Jill Griffin, Aileen A. Armstrong, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.  Jason J. Valtos, Osborne Law Offices, Washington, D.C., for Intervenor.