Skip to main content

United States Sixth Circuit


US v. Garrido, 05-6304

A conviction for possession of heroin with the intent to distribute the drug is affirmed over claims that: 1) the district court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence resulting from a traffic stop and subsequent, hour-long safety inspection and search of a vehicle; and 2) the evidence presented by the government was insufficient to support his conviction.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 11/09/2006
  • Published 11/09/2006

Judges

  • Before: GUY, GILMAN, and ROGERS, Circuit Judges.

Court

  • United States Sixth Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellees:
  • ARGUED:  Jeffrey M. Brandt, Robinson & Brandt, Cincinnati, Ohio, for Appellant.  Monica Wheatley, Assistant United States Attorney, Louisville, Kentucky, for Appellee.   ON BRIEF:  Jeffrey M. Brandt, Robinson & Brandt, Cincinnati, Ohio, for Appellant.  Monica Wheatley, Terry M. Cushing, Assistant United States Attorneys, Louisville, Kentucky, for Appellee.
Copied to clipboard