Skip to main content

United States Sixth Circuit


Rittenberry v. Morgan, 05-5606

The procedural hurdles under 28 U.S.C. section 2244(b) apply to any habeas corpus petition seeking relief from custody pursuant to a state court judgment. In the context of successive habeas petitions, a habeas petition under 28 U.S.C. section 2241 does not remain "an independent remedy for a claim of actual innocence."

Appellate Information

  • Decided 11/09/2006
  • Published 11/09/2006

Judges

  • Before: MARTIN and GILMAN, Circuit Judges;  SARGUS, District Judge.

Court

  • United States Sixth Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellees:
  • ARGUED:  Michael C. Holley, Federal Public Defender's Office, Nashville, Tennessee, for Appellant.  Jennifer L. Smith, Office of the Attorney General, Nashville, Tennessee, for Appellee.   ON BRIEF:  Michael C. Holley, Mariah A. Wooten, Federal Public Defender's Office, Nashville, Tennessee, for Appellant.  Jennifer L. Smith, Office of the Attorney General, Nashville, Tennessee, for Appellee.
Copied to clipboard