United States Sixth Circuit
Rittenberry v. Morgan, 05-5606
The procedural hurdles under 28 U.S.C. section 2244(b) apply to any habeas corpus petition seeking relief from custody pursuant to a state court judgment. In the context of successive habeas petitions, a habeas petition under 28 U.S.C. section 2241 does not remain "an independent remedy for a claim of actual innocence."
Appellate Information
- Decided 11/09/2006
- Published 11/09/2006
Judges
- Before: MARTIN and GILMAN, Circuit Judges; SARGUS, District Judge.
Court
- United States Sixth Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellees:
- ARGUED: Michael C. Holley, Federal Public Defender's Office, Nashville, Tennessee, for Appellant. Jennifer L. Smith, Office of the Attorney General, Nashville, Tennessee, for Appellee. ON BRIEF: Michael C. Holley, Mariah A. Wooten, Federal Public Defender's Office, Nashville, Tennessee, for Appellant. Jennifer L. Smith, Office of the Attorney General, Nashville, Tennessee, for Appellee.