Skip to main content

United States Sixth Circuit


US v. Hynes, 05-2036

Conviction of a former Detroit police officer, on charges arising from a scheme to remove seized drugs from the evidence room at a police department and sell those drugs for profit, is affirmed over claims that: 1) remarks and conduct by the district judge deprived him of his right to a fair trial; 2) the government's proof at trial so varied from the indictment that it violated his constitutional rights; 3) insufficient evidence the verdict on three counts; and 4) his attorney rendered constitutionally ineffective assistance.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 11/07/2006
  • Published 11/07/2006

Judges

  • Before CLAY and GILMAN, Circuit Judges;  OBERDORFER, District Judge.

Court

  • United States Sixth Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellees:
  • ARGUED:  Elizabeth L. Jacobs, Detroit, Michigan, for Appellant. Sarah Resnick Cohen, United States Attorney, Detroit, Michigan, for Appellee.   ON BRIEF:  Elizabeth L. Jacobs, Detroit, Michigan, for Appellant.  Sarah Resnick Cohen, Jonathan Tukel, United States Attorneys, Detroit, Michigan, for Appellee.
Copied to clipboard