United States Sixth Circuit
US v. Hynes, 05-2036
Conviction of a former Detroit police officer, on charges arising from a scheme to remove seized drugs from the evidence room at a police department and sell those drugs for profit, is affirmed over claims that: 1) remarks and conduct by the district judge deprived him of his right to a fair trial; 2) the government's proof at trial so varied from the indictment that it violated his constitutional rights; 3) insufficient evidence the verdict on three counts; and 4) his attorney rendered constitutionally ineffective assistance.
Appellate Information
- Decided 11/07/2006
- Published 11/07/2006
Judges
- Before CLAY and GILMAN, Circuit Judges; OBERDORFER, District Judge.
Court
- United States Sixth Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellees:
- ARGUED: Elizabeth L. Jacobs, Detroit, Michigan, for Appellant. Sarah Resnick Cohen, United States Attorney, Detroit, Michigan, for Appellee. ON BRIEF: Elizabeth L. Jacobs, Detroit, Michigan, for Appellant. Sarah Resnick Cohen, Jonathan Tukel, United States Attorneys, Detroit, Michigan, for Appellee.