Skip to main content

United States Sixth Circuit


US v. Haynes, 05-5889

Defendant's conviction and her resentencing for drug related offenses are affirmed over claims that the district court erred by failing to instruct the jury to make a defendant-specific finding as to drug quantity, and by failing to grant a safety valve reduction in her sentence.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 11/06/2006
  • Published 11/06/2006

Judges

  • Before:  ROGERS and GRIFFIN, Circuit Judges;  HOOD, Chief District Judge.

Court

  • United States Sixth Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellees:
  • Sunny A. Koshy, Asst. U.S. Attorney, Blanche B. Cook, Asst. U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney's Office, Nashville, TN, for Plaintiff-Appellee., ARGUED:Peter J. Strianse, Tune, Entrekin & White, Nashville, Tennessee, for Appellant.  Blanche B. Cook, Assistant United States Attorney, Nashville, Tennessee, for Appellee.   ON BRIEF:Peter J. Strianse, Tune, Entrekin & White, Nashville, Tennessee, for Appellant.  Blanche B. Cook, Assistant United States Attorney, Nashville, Tennessee, for Appellee.
Copied to clipboard