United States Sixth Circuit
US v. Haynes, 05-5889
Defendant's conviction and her resentencing for drug related offenses are affirmed over claims that the district court erred by failing to instruct the jury to make a defendant-specific finding as to drug quantity, and by failing to grant a safety valve reduction in her sentence.
Appellate Information
- Decided 11/06/2006
- Published 11/06/2006
Judges
- Before: ROGERS and GRIFFIN, Circuit Judges; HOOD, Chief District Judge.
Court
- United States Sixth Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellees:
- Sunny A. Koshy, Asst. U.S. Attorney, Blanche B. Cook, Asst. U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney's Office, Nashville, TN, for Plaintiff-Appellee., ARGUED:Peter J. Strianse, Tune, Entrekin & White, Nashville, Tennessee, for Appellant. Blanche B. Cook, Assistant United States Attorney, Nashville, Tennessee, for Appellee. ON BRIEF:Peter J. Strianse, Tune, Entrekin & White, Nashville, Tennessee, for Appellant. Blanche B. Cook, Assistant United States Attorney, Nashville, Tennessee, for Appellee.