United States Sixth Circuit

Defendant's conviction for armed bank robbery and using a firearm during a crime of violence is affirmed over claims that the second count of the indictment was insufficient or duplicitous, certain evidentiary rulings made during his trial were an abuse of discretion, and the district court improperly denied his motion to inquire of a juror.

Appellate Information

• Argued 06/08/2006
• Decided 09/13/2006
• Published 09/13/2006

Judges

• Before MARTIN, NORRIS, and McKEAGUE, Circuit Judges.

Court

• United States Sixth Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellees:
  
• ARGUED:  Shawn T. Kelly, Office of the Federal Public Defender, Dayton, Ohio, for Appellant.  Benjamin C. Glassman, Assistant United States Attorney, Cincinnati, Ohio, for Appellee.   ON BRIEF:  Shawn T. Kelly, Office of the Federal Public Defender, Dayton, Ohio, for Appellant.   Benjamin C. Glassman, Assistant United States Attorney, Cincinnati, Ohio, for Appellee.