United States Sixth Circuit

In a civil rights action alleging violation of plaintiffs' Fourth Amendment right to be free from unreasonable search and seizure, summary judgment for defendants is affirmed on the grounds that the evidence taken in the light most favorable to plaintiffs did not establish a constitutional violation.

Appellate Information

• Decided 09/01/2006
• Published 09/01/2006

Judges

• Before:  MARTIN, NORRIS, and McKEAGUE, Circuit Judges.

Court

• United States Sixth Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellees:
  
• ARGUED:  Peter J. Osetek, Osetek & Associates, Ann Arbor, Michigan, for Appellants.  Marcia L. Howe, Johnson, Rosati, LaBarge, Aseltyne & Field, Farmington Hills, Michigan, G. Gus Morris, Kupelian, Ormond & Magy, Southfield, Michigan, for Appellees.   ON BRIEF:  Peter J. Osetek, Osetek & Associates, Ann Arbor, Michigan, for Appellants.   Marcia L. Howe, Johnson, Rosati, LaBarge, Aseltyne & Field, Farmington Hills, Michigan, G. Gus Morris, Kupelian, Ormond & Magy, Southfield, Michigan, for Appellees.