United States Sixth Circuit

Denial of plaintiff's motion to alter, amend, or vacate an order which modified a prior preliminary injunction, which enjoined defendant-county from enforcing an adult entertainment ordinance in its entirety, is affirmed where it was proper to sever of the ordinance's licensing provisions from the remainder, thus permitting defendant to enforce zoning and construction provisions of the ordinance.

Appellate Information

• Decided 08/18/2006
• Published 08/18/2006

Judges

• Before:  MOORE, CLAY, and GRIFFIN, Circuit Judges.

Court

• United States Sixth Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellees:
  
• ARGUED:  H. Louis Sirkin, Sirkin, Pinales & Schwartz, Cincinnati, Ohio, for Appellants.  N. Scott Lilly, Jefferson County Attorney's Office, Louisville, Kentucky, for Appellee.   ON BRIEF:  H. Louis Sirkin, Jennifer M. Kinsley, Sirkin, Pinales & Schwartz, Cincinnati, Ohio, C. Michael Hatzell, Hatzell & Groves, Louisville, Kentucky, for Appellants.  N. Scott Lilly, Jefferson County Attorney's Office, Louisville, Kentucky, for Appellee.