United States Sixth Circuit

In a dispute arising over the price of packaging for parts that defendant supplied to plaintiff for use in constructing automobile seats, a judgment for plaintiff is affirmed over claims of error: 1) that the district court should have granted a motion for judgment as a matter of law because of the untimely nature of JCI's claims and because of the lack of evidence of an amortization agreement; 2) regarding jury instruction and a verdict for a) admission of evidence, and b) plaintiff's cross-appeal claiming errors regarding the amount of damages awarded.

Appellate Information

• Decided 08/18/2006
• Published 08/18/2006

Judges

• Before:  MARTIN, MOORE, and ROGERS, Circuit Judges.

Court

• United States Sixth Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellees:
  
• ARGUED:  E. Edward Hood, Dykema Gossett, Ann Arbor, Michigan, for Appellant.  Sheldon H. Klein, Butzel Long, Detroit, Michigan, for Appellee.   ON BRIEF:  E. Edward Hood, Bradley L. Smith, Dykema Gossett, Ann Arbor, Michigan, for Appellant.  Sheldon H. Klein, Philip J. Kessler, Robin K. Luce, Butzel Long, Detroit, Michigan, for Appellee.