United States Sixth Circuit

A sentence of one day in prison imposed pursuant to defendant's conviction on two counts of bank fraud is reversed where the 99.89% variance, based on defendant's age and the date on which the underlying crimes were committed, was unreasonable.

Appellate Information

• Decided 08/14/2006
• Published 08/14/2006

Judges

• Before:  BOGGS, Chief Judge;  KEITH and SUTTON, Circuit Judges.

Court

• United States Sixth Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellees:
  
• ARGUED:  Benjamin C. Glassman, Assistant United States Attorney, Cincinnati, Ohio, for Appellant.  C. Mark Pickrell, Waller, Lansden, Dortch & Davis, Nashville, Tennessee, for Appellee.   ON BRIEF:  Benjamin C. Glassman, Assistant United States Attorney, Cincinnati, Ohio, for Appellant.   C. Mark Pickrell, Waller, Lansden, Dortch & Davis, Nashville, Tennessee, for Appellee.