United States Sixth Circuit

Defendant's conviction for receiving and possessing child pornography is affirmed over a claim of improper denial of a suppression motion based on an argument that three search warrants leading to evidence incriminating him were not supported by probable cause.

Appellate Information

• Decided 06/27/2006
• Published 06/27/2006

Judges

• Before:  BOGGS, Chief Judge;  BATCHELDER, Circuit Judge;  and WEBER, District Judge.

Court

• United States Sixth Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellees:
  
• ARGUED:  H. Louis Sirkin, Sirkin, Pinales & Schwartz, Cincinnati, Ohio, for Appellant.  John Patrick Grant, Assistant United States Attorney, Lexington, Kentucky, for Appellee.   ON BRIEF:  H. Louis Sirkin, Jennifer M. Kinsley, Sirkin, Pinales & Schwartz, Cincinnati, Ohio, for Appellant.  John Patrick Grant, Assistant United States Attorney, Lexington, Kentucky, for Appellee.