United States Sixth Circuit

Dismissal of plaintiffs' cases against defendants involving their allegedly illegal interference with her ownership of property is affirmed where the district court properly ruled that the Rooker-Feldman doctrine barred jurisdiction over certain claims, and plaintiff was collaterally estopped from raising all her remaining claims. Plaintiff also failed to state a claim against state supreme court justices.

Appellate Information

• Decided 06/20/2006
• Published 06/20/2006

Judges

• Before:  COLE, CLAY, and GIBBONS, Circuit Judges.

Court

• United States Sixth Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellees:
  
• ON BRIEF:  Eric A. Braverman, Lincoln Park, Michigan, Margaret A. Nelson, Office of the Attorney General, Lansing, Michigan, David M. Findling, Findling Law Firm, Royal Oak, Michigan, for Appellees.   Linda McCormick, Livonia, Michigan, pro se.