United States Sixth Circuit

In an action for pregnancy discrimination brought under the Pregnancy Discrimination Act on a theory of disparate treatment, summary judgment for defendant-employer is affirmed where the terms of defendant's light-duty policy did not support an inference of pregnancy discrimination, and plaintiff-truck driver failed to supply evidence tending to prove pretext or discriminatory intent.

Appellate Information

• Decided 05/16/2006
• Published 05/16/2006

Judges

• Before:  NORRIS, SUHRHEINRICH, and ROGERS, Circuit Judges.

Court

• United States Sixth Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellees:
  
• ARGUED:  Michael D. Cooke, Iuka, Mississippi, for Appellant.   Jeff Weintraub, Weintraub, Stock & Grisham, Memphis, Tennessee, for Appellee.   ON BRIEF:  Michael D. Cooke, Iuka, Mississippi, for Appellant.   Jeff Weintraub, J. Gregory Grisham, Weintraub, Stock & Grisham, Memphis, Tennessee, for Appellee.