United States Sixth Circuit
Briscoe v. Fine, 05-5097
Summary judgment for defendants in a suit brought by former employees under ERISA and state tort laws is reversed in part as to summary judgment in favor of a company's healthcare plan administrator where the administrator exercised at least partial control over plan assets and, to the extent that it did so, qualified as an ERISA fiduciary.
Appellate Information
- Decided 04/13/2006
- Published 04/13/2006
Judges
- Before: RYAN, CLAY, and GILMAN, Circuit Judges.
Court
- United States Sixth Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellees:
- ARGUED: David L. Leightty, Leightty & Associates, Louisville, Kentucky, for Appellants. Robert W. Bishop, Bishop & Associates, Louisville, Kentucky, David Domene, Blackburn, Hundley & Domene, Louisville, Kentucky, William D. Roberts, Hall, Render, Killian, Heath & Lyman, Louisville, Kentucky, for Appellees. ON BRIEF: David L. Leightty, Leightty & Associates, Louisville, Kentucky, for Appellants. Robert W. Bishop, Bishop & Associates, Louisville, Kentucky, David Domene, Blackburn, Hundley & Domene, Louisville, Kentucky, William D. Roberts, A. Courtney Guild, Jr., Jay P. Turner, Hall, Render, Killian, Heath & Lyman, Louisville, Kentucky, for Appellees.