United States Sixth Circuit

Denial of a motion for a preliminary injunction brought by plaintiffs, individuals involved in a clinical drug trial sponsored by defendant-drug manufacturer, to require defendant to provide them with certain drug treatment is affirmed where there was no abuse of discretion in the district court's analysis of the factors for an injunction.

Appellate Information

• Decided 03/29/2006
• Published 03/29/2006

Judges

• Before:  MARTIN, NORRIS, and DAUGHTREY, Circuit Judges.

Court

• United States Sixth Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellees:
  
• ARGUED:  Alan C. Milstein, Sherman, Silverstein, Kohl, Rose & Podolsky, Pennsauken, New Jersey, for Appellants.  Mark D. Gately, Hogan & Hartson, L.L.P., Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.   ON BRIEF:  Alan C. Milstein, Sherman, Silverstein, Kohl, Rose & Podolsky, Pennsauken, New Jersey, for Appellants.  Mark D. Gately, Lauren S. Colton, Hogan & Hartson, L.L.P., Baltimore, Maryland, Winston E. Miller, Frost, Brown, Todd, LLC, Louisville, Kentucky, Keith Moorman, Susan J. Pope, Frost, Brown, Todd, LLC, Lexington, Kentucky, Catherine E. Stetson, Michele W. Sartori, Hogan & Hartson, L.L.P., Washington, D.C., for Appellee.