United States Sixth Circuit
Stuart v. Wilson, 05-3092
Dismissal of a habeas application challenging a conviction for rape of a victim under the age of thirteen and a related offense is affirmed where a state court's decision to admit certain hearsay evidence was not contrary to clearly established federal law with respect to: 1) a child victim who was unwilling to testify; and 2) the trustworthiness of the hearsay evidence.
Appellate Information
- Decided 03/27/2006
- Published 03/27/2006
Judges
- Before: RYAN, CLAY, and GILMAN, Circuit Judges.
Court
- United States Sixth Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellees:
- ARGUED: Nathan A. Ray, Akron, Ohio, for Appellant. Erik J. Clark, Ohio Attorney General Office, Columbus, Ohio, for Appellee. ON BRIEF: Nathan A. Ray, Akron, Ohio, for Appellant. Gregory T. Hartke, Ohio Attorney General Office, Corrections Litigation Section, Cleveland, Ohio, for Appellee.