United States Sixth Circuit

Revocation of defendant's supervised-release term and sentence for violations of several supervised-release conditions is affirmed over his claims that: 1) the district court violated the Ex Post Facto Clause by sentencing him under a certain statutory provision, and 2) an imposition of a maximum postrevocation prison term foreclosed the possibility of a new term of supervised release.

Appellate Information

• Decided 02/07/2006
• Published 02/07/2006

Judges

• Before:  MOORE and SUTTON, Circuit Judges;  BUNNING, District Judge.

Court

• United States Sixth Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellees:
  
• ARGUED:  Steven S. Nolder, Federal Public Defender's Office, Columbus, Ohio, for Appellant.  Salvador A. Dominguez, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbus, Ohio, for Appellee.   ON BRIEF:  Steven S. Nolder, Federal Public Defender's Office, Columbus, Ohio, for Appellant.   Salvador A. Dominguez, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbus, Ohio, for Appellee.